David Talcott has an excellent post entitled "Protestant Hymnody and Making Male Leaders" (dated March 12) found here. Read it! Meanwhile, I will post a great hymn.
Rise up, O Men of God!
Rise up, O men of God!
Have done with lesser things;
Give heart and soul and mind and strength
To servethe King of kings.
Rise up, O men of God!
His kingdom tarries long;
Bring in the day of brotherhood,
And end the night of wrong.
Rise up, O men of God!
The Church for you doth wait,
Her strength unequal to her task;
Rise up and make her great.
Lift high the cross of Christ;
Tread where his feet have trod;
As brothers of the Son of man
Rise up, O men of God!
-William H. Walter
Saturday, March 12, 2005
Speaking of being hungry...
Perhaps it was the discussion on the Ockhamist's page here on herbal/organice vs. "real science" or the fact that I work in a health food store (and love it), or maybe it was my trip to King Buffet on Friday with Regina and Piko (yay KB!) that prompted me once again to think about food and eating. I think in our culture we think a lot about food- I know I do- and not just in the "food=survival" sense. We're an overweight nation and not just because of genetics. We're the culture of snack food, processed/packaged food, all-you-can-eat food and "biggie size my fries with that." How often, though, do we think about what we eat or how much in light of God's Word? After all, when Paul says, "So, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God," (1 Corinthians 10:31) I think he really meant eat and drink as well as the other applications that we most often ascribe to the verse. I had considered for a brief time doing my senior thesis on a Biblical theology of eating. It's an interesting topic- perhaps for another time. So how do we eat or drink to the glory of God?
I am not prepared to answer that question but I think there must be a way. Consider for a moment the life of a dancer. At Christmas time, my little sister Rachel was describing how the dancers at Interlochen Arts Academy (where she attends for visual art) live out their lives. Basically, everything revolves around their ability to perform. So what they eat and how much they eat and how often they eat all revolves around dance and becoming a better dancer. This focus, even on the small everyday tasks, is something for which the Christian should also strive, to be able to do everything, even drink orange juice, to the glory of God. May God grant us the wisdom and grace for such a task.
I am not prepared to answer that question but I think there must be a way. Consider for a moment the life of a dancer. At Christmas time, my little sister Rachel was describing how the dancers at Interlochen Arts Academy (where she attends for visual art) live out their lives. Basically, everything revolves around their ability to perform. So what they eat and how much they eat and how often they eat all revolves around dance and becoming a better dancer. This focus, even on the small everyday tasks, is something for which the Christian should also strive, to be able to do everything, even drink orange juice, to the glory of God. May God grant us the wisdom and grace for such a task.
Thursday, March 10, 2005
The Pursuit of God
Being a religion major is great. In researching for my senior Religion thesis I get to read guys like Augustine, Edwards, Spurgeon, Lewis, Piper and others- and even get credit for it. Today, I was reading A.W. Tozer again and loving it. I read The Pursuit of God for the first time a couple of years ago when Matthew (my fiance!) gave it to me. Here are some excerpts from the opening chapter:
"The doctrine of justification by faith- a biblical truth, and a blessed relief from sterile legalism and unavailing self-effort- has in our time fallen into evil company and been interrupted by many in such a manner as actually to bar men from the knowledge of God. The whole transaction of religious conversion has been made mechanical and spiritless. Faith may now be exercised without a jar to the moral life and without embarrassment to the Adamic ego. Christ may be 'received' without creating any special love for Him in the soul of the receiver. The man is 'saved,' but he is not hungry or thirsty after God. In fact, he is specifically taught to be satisfied and is encouraged to be content with little...Everything is made center upon our initial act of 'accepting' (a term, incidentally, which is not found in the Bible) and we are not expected thereafter to crave any further revelation of God to our souls."
Although first published more than 50 years ago, this indictment perhaps rings more true today than ever. It was Augstine who wrote, "You have formed us for yourself and our hearts are restless until they rest in you." There is a deep, passionate Christianity which many saints have experienced which I think many today are lacking, including myself. Deep love requires vulnerability and weakness and introspection. It also involves being emotional and passionate, which can be an evil to many in the Reformed circle. Are we too satisfied? Do we hunger after God?
"O God, I have tasted Thy goodness, and it has both satisfied me and made me thirsty for more. I am painfully conscious of my need for further grace. I am ashamed of my lack of desire. O God, the Triune God, I want to want Thee; I long to be filled with longing; I thirst to be made more thirsty still. Show me Thy glory, I pray Thee, that so I may know Thee indeed. Begin in mercy a new work of love within me. Say to my soul, 'Rise up, my love, my fair one and come away." Then give me grace to rise and follow Thee up from this misty lowland where I have wandered so long. Amen." -A.W. Tozer
"The doctrine of justification by faith- a biblical truth, and a blessed relief from sterile legalism and unavailing self-effort- has in our time fallen into evil company and been interrupted by many in such a manner as actually to bar men from the knowledge of God. The whole transaction of religious conversion has been made mechanical and spiritless. Faith may now be exercised without a jar to the moral life and without embarrassment to the Adamic ego. Christ may be 'received' without creating any special love for Him in the soul of the receiver. The man is 'saved,' but he is not hungry or thirsty after God. In fact, he is specifically taught to be satisfied and is encouraged to be content with little...Everything is made center upon our initial act of 'accepting' (a term, incidentally, which is not found in the Bible) and we are not expected thereafter to crave any further revelation of God to our souls."
Although first published more than 50 years ago, this indictment perhaps rings more true today than ever. It was Augstine who wrote, "You have formed us for yourself and our hearts are restless until they rest in you." There is a deep, passionate Christianity which many saints have experienced which I think many today are lacking, including myself. Deep love requires vulnerability and weakness and introspection. It also involves being emotional and passionate, which can be an evil to many in the Reformed circle. Are we too satisfied? Do we hunger after God?
"O God, I have tasted Thy goodness, and it has both satisfied me and made me thirsty for more. I am painfully conscious of my need for further grace. I am ashamed of my lack of desire. O God, the Triune God, I want to want Thee; I long to be filled with longing; I thirst to be made more thirsty still. Show me Thy glory, I pray Thee, that so I may know Thee indeed. Begin in mercy a new work of love within me. Say to my soul, 'Rise up, my love, my fair one and come away." Then give me grace to rise and follow Thee up from this misty lowland where I have wandered so long. Amen." -A.W. Tozer
Sunday, March 06, 2005
Amerika: Follow-up articles.
I just ran across some interesting articles in the back issues of Christian Counter Culture that tie into to my last post. I haven't gotten through them all, but take a look here.
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Was Jesus "American?"
Disclaimer: I grew up in one of the most intensely patriotic families in the country. I am the daughter of an Army major, my fiance is in the Navy, and my future brother-in-law is serving in Iraq as we speak. So this post should not in any way be construed as anti-American. I love this country. It's merely an attempt to provoke American Christians to think more deeply about their American Christianity.
At Hillsdale College, where they synthesis the Judeo-Christian with the Greco-Roman, political and religious circles often blend indiscriminantly. The very roots of American philosophy grew out of the Protestant ethic. What has troubled me most in the past couple years here has been the statement about America being a "Christian nation." So I pose the question: was Jesus "American?" or rather, should America really be considered a Christian nation? Even people who answer "yes" to this question use the term "Christian nation" in many different ways. So in consideration of this topic, let's first try to define what exactly is or should be meant by "Christian Nation," then ask if this model is compatible with Scripture both for our personal lives and in the church's vision for the nations.
First, some people use the term "Christian nation" simply to mean that America was founded by Christian men with Christian ideals such as Protestant individualism and Anabaptist separation of church and state. I can live with this definition. Another definition means the term to refer to Christianity as the religion with which most American affiliate themselves. Also true and one with which I am comfortable. A third definition is one that not only bothers non-Christians but also concerns me. This definition almost completely blends, sometimes intentionally and other times not, all things American with all things Christian. In other words, the America dream becomes the Christian's dream for his/her personal life and the American way becomes the Christian's goal for the world.
(Just as an interesting side note: I think it's worth thinking about that many in the Islamic world that evaluate our claims to be "Christian" say that America is very immoral and has fallen away from its own Scriptures. While we might say the same about extremist Muslims, we cannot deny this claim in good conscience, I don't think.)
I think we got this unhealthy ethnocentrism by adopting the Puritan's "city on a hill" rhetoric which originally came from Augustine. (And incidentally referred to the church as a body of Christian believers, and not a political entity.) Now I do not dispute that we are the freest country on earth with the best system of government ever and that we have the highest standard of living ever known- or that involvement in politics by Christians is somehow bad. That being said, I take issue with blending American ideals and Christian ideals indiscriminantly. Even if we have done it unknowingly, I think it's time to wake up and take a second look.
In the first place, though it has been pounded into our heads, the "American Dream" is not necessarily compatible with the Christian dream for a person's individual life. By the "American Dream" I refer to that idea that "the pursuit of happiness" consists of an individual making his own way to become happy. And that the content of said "happiness" is economic betterment, social status, political and/or academic power and finally, retirement on a golf course in Florida- because, after all, that previous work deserves some rest! And as kids in school we are told that we can do anything and be anything, and we are told that some career paths are more prestigious than others. Now, I am not against working hard, and I am not against Christians who find earthly successes. What I oppose is the motivation that often drives these outcomes, which is just ourselves in many cases.
What should be the goal of a Christian's life? Pauls says, "I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." (Philippians 3:14) His goal is the prize of the call of God, which is manifested in Christ. What is the prize? Paul again tells us, "Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men, knowing that from the Lord you will receive the inheritance as your reward." (Colossians 3:23-24) Peter tells us that this inheritance is "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God's power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time." (1 Peter 1:4-5) And in fact, this treasure is seeing and savoring Christ in heaven for ever! His grace is for us now, but this eternal reward is not for this earth, it is for eternity. Then what is this call of God that leads us to this reward, that bring us to Christ? Look no further than God's most explicit revelation himself on the cross in Christ. Jesus, in fact, beckons to us, "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me." (Mark 16:24) (Deny himself? That doesn't sound very American!) A call to become a follower of Christ is a call to suffer- to suffer the agony of a soul faced with its own sinfulness and the agony of a soul then called to live in a suffering, fallen world. Christ promises us, "If they persecute me, they will also persecute you." (John 15:20) The cross is a place of death, and Christ calls us to die to our sin (and in effect to our selfish desires) and also to die for others. So perhaps the path of prosperity is not necessarily the path to Christ. Christ may bless, but as in the case of Israel many times, be wary of relying on the gifts and not the giver! And for another thing, is retirement a biblical concept? NO! Christ promises us rest, but it's a rest in heaven, after the suffering of this life. Does he ever say we can stop laboring for the kingdom and just while away our time in "paradise." I think the idea of retirement is perhaps the most detrimental to the American Christian. It's a worthless and wasteful goal. Sure, there may be retirement from one thing to another, but to think we deserve our yacht and condo! Remember always the saints who pursued Christ with passion among the nations until the end of their lives, at 60, 70, and 80 years old.
Now, America as a nation has a goal for the world- spreading democracy and American culture. I can't argue with democracy, but it can be dangerous for the church to ally itself too closely with American goals for the world. The church, like individual believer, has the goal of pursuing Christ, but God set up the church for a specific work, namely to make disciples. That often includes meeting physical needs, but Christ's primary charge to his disciples was to go out and make disciples of all nations, to bring them Christ who will meet their spiritual needs. Too often, the danger of allying ourselves with American ethnocentrism too heavily is that we want to smother other cultures with our own. We are to be incarnational in our ministry, just as Christ became a man to save sinful men. Paul says, "I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. " (1 Corinthians 9:22) This does not mean sacrificing the truth but it might definitely mean sacrificing our own culture. Paul even had Timothy circumcised because "the Jews who were in those places, for they all knew that his father was a Greek." (Ats 16:3) Jesus was not "American!" Our attitude when approaching a new culture should be one of openess and servitude, offering them the best way to use their culture and heritage- in the wrship of Christ. So as a body of believers, it should be our main concern to bring sinful people to Christ, even if that means dying to our own culture to reach them.
I know that here on Hillsdale's campus there are organizations that label themselves "Christian" but don't follow Scriptural guidelines. They're more like self-interested cliques that often conduct themselves in a worse manner than their non-Christian counterparts- even excluding fellow Christians. They pursue recruitment for their club with more zeal than they do non-believers to follow Christ. These are not the church! They can never take the place of Christ's bride and must never attempt such. Too often we get caught up in political and social groups and lose our connection to the upward call of God and to his church. This is tragic and often leaves the church (and in this case, the campus) without strong leaders, and gives the world a false impression of Christianity.
In closing, I don't think that the "American Dream" is flawed in that it pursues happiness or pleasure. I think that the problem with the American Dream is that it is not big enough, it does not aspire to enough happiness, and it does not seek enough pleasure. Sound funny? Well, consider that God is the content of Happiness, Joy and Fulfillment. What better way to pursue what most benefits us than by pursuing the glory of God, even if that includes temporal suffering? So let us dream big for Christ and for what he can do through us and through the church for our joy and the joy of all peoples.
At Hillsdale College, where they synthesis the Judeo-Christian with the Greco-Roman, political and religious circles often blend indiscriminantly. The very roots of American philosophy grew out of the Protestant ethic. What has troubled me most in the past couple years here has been the statement about America being a "Christian nation." So I pose the question: was Jesus "American?" or rather, should America really be considered a Christian nation? Even people who answer "yes" to this question use the term "Christian nation" in many different ways. So in consideration of this topic, let's first try to define what exactly is or should be meant by "Christian Nation," then ask if this model is compatible with Scripture both for our personal lives and in the church's vision for the nations.
First, some people use the term "Christian nation" simply to mean that America was founded by Christian men with Christian ideals such as Protestant individualism and Anabaptist separation of church and state. I can live with this definition. Another definition means the term to refer to Christianity as the religion with which most American affiliate themselves. Also true and one with which I am comfortable. A third definition is one that not only bothers non-Christians but also concerns me. This definition almost completely blends, sometimes intentionally and other times not, all things American with all things Christian. In other words, the America dream becomes the Christian's dream for his/her personal life and the American way becomes the Christian's goal for the world.
(Just as an interesting side note: I think it's worth thinking about that many in the Islamic world that evaluate our claims to be "Christian" say that America is very immoral and has fallen away from its own Scriptures. While we might say the same about extremist Muslims, we cannot deny this claim in good conscience, I don't think.)
I think we got this unhealthy ethnocentrism by adopting the Puritan's "city on a hill" rhetoric which originally came from Augustine. (And incidentally referred to the church as a body of Christian believers, and not a political entity.) Now I do not dispute that we are the freest country on earth with the best system of government ever and that we have the highest standard of living ever known- or that involvement in politics by Christians is somehow bad. That being said, I take issue with blending American ideals and Christian ideals indiscriminantly. Even if we have done it unknowingly, I think it's time to wake up and take a second look.
In the first place, though it has been pounded into our heads, the "American Dream" is not necessarily compatible with the Christian dream for a person's individual life. By the "American Dream" I refer to that idea that "the pursuit of happiness" consists of an individual making his own way to become happy. And that the content of said "happiness" is economic betterment, social status, political and/or academic power and finally, retirement on a golf course in Florida- because, after all, that previous work deserves some rest! And as kids in school we are told that we can do anything and be anything, and we are told that some career paths are more prestigious than others. Now, I am not against working hard, and I am not against Christians who find earthly successes. What I oppose is the motivation that often drives these outcomes, which is just ourselves in many cases.
What should be the goal of a Christian's life? Pauls says, "I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus." (Philippians 3:14) His goal is the prize of the call of God, which is manifested in Christ. What is the prize? Paul again tells us, "Whatever you do, work heartily, as for the Lord and not for men, knowing that from the Lord you will receive the inheritance as your reward." (Colossians 3:23-24) Peter tells us that this inheritance is "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you, who by God's power are being guarded through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last time." (1 Peter 1:4-5) And in fact, this treasure is seeing and savoring Christ in heaven for ever! His grace is for us now, but this eternal reward is not for this earth, it is for eternity. Then what is this call of God that leads us to this reward, that bring us to Christ? Look no further than God's most explicit revelation himself on the cross in Christ. Jesus, in fact, beckons to us, "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me." (Mark 16:24) (Deny himself? That doesn't sound very American!) A call to become a follower of Christ is a call to suffer- to suffer the agony of a soul faced with its own sinfulness and the agony of a soul then called to live in a suffering, fallen world. Christ promises us, "If they persecute me, they will also persecute you." (John 15:20) The cross is a place of death, and Christ calls us to die to our sin (and in effect to our selfish desires) and also to die for others. So perhaps the path of prosperity is not necessarily the path to Christ. Christ may bless, but as in the case of Israel many times, be wary of relying on the gifts and not the giver! And for another thing, is retirement a biblical concept? NO! Christ promises us rest, but it's a rest in heaven, after the suffering of this life. Does he ever say we can stop laboring for the kingdom and just while away our time in "paradise." I think the idea of retirement is perhaps the most detrimental to the American Christian. It's a worthless and wasteful goal. Sure, there may be retirement from one thing to another, but to think we deserve our yacht and condo! Remember always the saints who pursued Christ with passion among the nations until the end of their lives, at 60, 70, and 80 years old.
Now, America as a nation has a goal for the world- spreading democracy and American culture. I can't argue with democracy, but it can be dangerous for the church to ally itself too closely with American goals for the world. The church, like individual believer, has the goal of pursuing Christ, but God set up the church for a specific work, namely to make disciples. That often includes meeting physical needs, but Christ's primary charge to his disciples was to go out and make disciples of all nations, to bring them Christ who will meet their spiritual needs. Too often, the danger of allying ourselves with American ethnocentrism too heavily is that we want to smother other cultures with our own. We are to be incarnational in our ministry, just as Christ became a man to save sinful men. Paul says, "I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. " (1 Corinthians 9:22) This does not mean sacrificing the truth but it might definitely mean sacrificing our own culture. Paul even had Timothy circumcised because "the Jews who were in those places, for they all knew that his father was a Greek." (Ats 16:3) Jesus was not "American!" Our attitude when approaching a new culture should be one of openess and servitude, offering them the best way to use their culture and heritage- in the wrship of Christ. So as a body of believers, it should be our main concern to bring sinful people to Christ, even if that means dying to our own culture to reach them.
I know that here on Hillsdale's campus there are organizations that label themselves "Christian" but don't follow Scriptural guidelines. They're more like self-interested cliques that often conduct themselves in a worse manner than their non-Christian counterparts- even excluding fellow Christians. They pursue recruitment for their club with more zeal than they do non-believers to follow Christ. These are not the church! They can never take the place of Christ's bride and must never attempt such. Too often we get caught up in political and social groups and lose our connection to the upward call of God and to his church. This is tragic and often leaves the church (and in this case, the campus) without strong leaders, and gives the world a false impression of Christianity.
In closing, I don't think that the "American Dream" is flawed in that it pursues happiness or pleasure. I think that the problem with the American Dream is that it is not big enough, it does not aspire to enough happiness, and it does not seek enough pleasure. Sound funny? Well, consider that God is the content of Happiness, Joy and Fulfillment. What better way to pursue what most benefits us than by pursuing the glory of God, even if that includes temporal suffering? So let us dream big for Christ and for what he can do through us and through the church for our joy and the joy of all peoples.
Wednesday, February 16, 2005
What happened?
I cried today. That's how much this small encounter today affected me.
I was at work downtown all day today and it was a pretty busy day. And just as several customers were in the store, this young guy (about my age) walks in with a red duffle bag. He waits patiently and then when he gets my attention, I realize that he is soliciting small toys an trinkets. And I know that we don't take solicitors and the situation feels awkward as he launches into his pitch and I am trying to figure out a way to tell him. Another customer walks up and needs asistance, so I go help him. When I come back, the guy had spread his wares across the counter, and yet another customer needed my help, so he looks at me a moment. Embarrassed, he hurriedly stuffs his merhcandise back into his bag and mumbles that he will come back another time. Later, I saw him pass by the store again, but he didn't stop.
The awkwardness of the situation embarrassed me. I didn't want to buy anything from him, and yet I wanted to give him something, or say something kind. I don't know why. And the encounter bothered me all day. Was it unsettling because I am a middle class collegiate? I'd like to think it wasn't merely pity or class propriety...I still don't know. Sigh.
Lord, may it be my own soul that I pity most, and in so doing, may I find joy in your grace.
I was at work downtown all day today and it was a pretty busy day. And just as several customers were in the store, this young guy (about my age) walks in with a red duffle bag. He waits patiently and then when he gets my attention, I realize that he is soliciting small toys an trinkets. And I know that we don't take solicitors and the situation feels awkward as he launches into his pitch and I am trying to figure out a way to tell him. Another customer walks up and needs asistance, so I go help him. When I come back, the guy had spread his wares across the counter, and yet another customer needed my help, so he looks at me a moment. Embarrassed, he hurriedly stuffs his merhcandise back into his bag and mumbles that he will come back another time. Later, I saw him pass by the store again, but he didn't stop.
The awkwardness of the situation embarrassed me. I didn't want to buy anything from him, and yet I wanted to give him something, or say something kind. I don't know why. And the encounter bothered me all day. Was it unsettling because I am a middle class collegiate? I'd like to think it wasn't merely pity or class propriety...I still don't know. Sigh.
Lord, may it be my own soul that I pity most, and in so doing, may I find joy in your grace.
Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Who am I?
Today I got angry. Really angry. I was (am?) angry at people and circumstances, and they way some people treat each other and the way that affects me. And I was really, really mad and frustrated. It bothered me so much that I started to consider some of the reasons why I might be angry. God says, commands, "Be angry and do not sin" (Ephesians 4:26) and so I wondered whether or not I was sinning in my anger. There certainly is a righteous and commanded type of anger, but often times I know that I, and others, carry around a sinful anger. Emotions don't just hit you like wave and you must just brace yourself until they recede; they come out of who you are. So my question to myself then is, what does this anger say about me? Am I angry at a person because I have expectations of them that really only can be met by God? In that case, my anger at its root is an anger at God, and becomes a feeling of which I need to repent. My frustration then would point to my lack of trust in God's sovereign plan and in his sufficiency to meet ALL of my needs, and any lack of trust or faith on my part (in other words, lying about who he is by not trusting him) is a sin. I believe that if this were the case, then my anger is a sin and something I need to take to God humbly and repent. God isn't just a venting ear, either, which is what I fear many of us take him to be at one time or another.
Another question I might ask myself in my anger is, am I angry because I feel wronged and I want compensation for the wrong? This is where I think many of us fall, because we know we have been wronged, it's clear, and so we feel justified in our anger. True, anger at the sin may be fine, but our need to be justified often clouds up our focus so much that we do one or both of a couple things: first, we may take our own revenge against the wrongdoer, forming our own clever punishiments, whether through our relationship or some other means, or second, we may become so discouraged by our hurt that we quit trusting people and withdraw from relationship altogether. Both responses, I think, are wrong and sinful, and both once again show a lack of trust in God. Yes, people hurt us and harm us wrongfully, but God is keeping tabs- that's not our job and in the end he will deal out the strokes, if not in this life. Taking our own action, displays lack of trust in his effectiveness and will. People hurt us because all people, even you and me, operate out of hearts that completely sinful but by the grace of God and his Holy Spirit working in us. Withdrawing from relationship to protect oneself is not the answer either, because once again it shows a lack of trust in God's love and in his ability to fulfill our needs despite attacks or rejection from other people. Look at the cross- there Christ performed the ultimate act of love toward a people who hated him. And Christ calls us to take up our crosses and follow him to that death for sinful people who will hurt and possibly kill us.
So I guess this is just a really good reminder to me to always be taking my emotions and responses to God and asking him to help me sort them out, and see if there is yet room for his refining fire to help me trust him more. And I know the answer already- I always need his help to trust him more. And I have to remember that his ways, though sometimes hidden, are perfect and his judgments are just. Who am I to even think that I know better?
"Search me, O God, and know my heart! Try me and know my thoughts! And see if there be any grievous way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting!" - Psalm 139:23-24
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)